Do I Have More Free Will Than You Do? An Unexpected Asymmetry in Intuitions About Personal Freedom

Brian D. Earp

Brian D. Earp Yale University

Abstract

The present research explores the relationship between moral evaluations and intuitions about the causes of human behavior, in particular freedom of the will. Two studies test for a self-serving bias in intuitions about free will. Study 1 explores whether individuals may seek to exculpate themselves from wrongdoing by denying free will, while justifying blame of others by endorsing free will. Study 2 explores whether individuals may justify personal failures by denying free will, while taking credit for personal successes by endorsing free will. In neither study do the data show the predicted differences between conditions. However, an unexpected finding is reported. By pooling the data from both experiments and collapsing across conditions, it is shown that participants give greater endorsement of free will whenever actions are described from a first-person, instead of third-person, perspective—a tentative “I have more free will than you do” effect. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed, as are avenues for further research on this topic.

References

Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556-74.

Bargh, J. A. & Earp, B. D. (2009). The will is caused, not “free.” Dialogue: Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 13-15.

Ditto, P., Pizarro, D., & Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. In D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Moral judgment and decision making: The psychology of learning and motivation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Fayard, J. V., Bassi, A. K., Bernstein, D. M., & Roberts, B. W. (2009). Is cleanliness next to godliness? Dispelling old wives’ tales: Failure to replicate Zhong and Liljenquist (2006). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 6(2), 21–30.

Gámez, E., Diaz, J., Marrero, H. (2011). The uncertain universality of the Macbeth Effect with a Spanish sample. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 156-162.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-34.

Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219-266.

Jones, E. E. & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of the behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, pp. 79-94.

Knobe, J. (2009). Person as scientist, person as moralist. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.

Knobe, J. and Doris, J. (forthcoming). Strawsonian variations: Folk morality and the search for a unified theory. To appear in J. Doris and the Moral Psychology Research Group (Eds.), The Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.

Malle, B. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 895–919.

Nichols, S. & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuition. Nous, 41, 663–685.

Nietzche, F. (1889/2003). Twilight of the Idols. Translated from original German by Walter Kaufmaan and R.J. Hollingdale. Penguin Books: London.

Phillips, J. & Knobe, J. (2009). Moral judgments and intuitions about freedom. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 30-36.

Pronin, E. (2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320, 1177-1180.

Pronin, E., Berger, J., & Molouki, S. (2007). Alone in a crowd of sheep: Asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 585-595.

Tannenbaum, D., Ditto, P., & Pizarro, D. (2009). Different moral values produce different judgments of intentional action. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Irvine.

Zhong, C. B. & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452.

Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attributional theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287.