Students’ Perceptions of and Preferences for Professors

Accalia R. Kusto; Stephanie E. Afful; Brent A. Mattingly

Accalia R. Kusto St. Louis University
Stephanie E. Afful Fontbonne University
Brent A. Mattingly Ashland University

Abstract

We examined the similarity of students’ perceptions of and preferences for the behaviors of professors in three different disciplines. Undergraduate students who had taken a history, biology, or psychology class rated actual and ideal professors on 20 behaviors (e.g., disclosure of personal information). Students perceived psychology professors to be different than history and biology professors on several characteristics, despite similarity in student ratings of ideal preferences across these disciplines. We discuss implications for both professors and students regarding course evaluations and learning, respectively.

References

Adamson, G., O’Kane, D., & Shevlin, M. (2005). Students’ ratings of teaching effectiveness: A laughing matter? Psychological Reports, 96, 225-226.

Beishline, M. J., & Holmes, C. B. (1997). Student preferences for various teaching styles. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24, 95-99.

Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitve retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173-189.

Blakemore, J. E. O. (2003). Children’s beliefs about violating gender norms: Boys shouldn’t look like girls, and girls shouldn’t act like boys. Sex Roles, 48, 411-419.

Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. In S. F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Castel, A. D. (2008). Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: The utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 36, 429-437.

Das, M., & El-Sabban, F. (1996). Student and faculty perceptions of the characteristics of an ideal teacher in a classroom setting. Medical Teacher, 18, 141-146.

Epting, L. K., Zinn, T. E., Buskist, C., & Buskist, W. (2004). Student perspectives on the distinction between ideal and typical teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 181-183.

Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209-1217.

Gurung, R. A. R., & Vespia, K. M. (2007). Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 5-10.

Jensen, W., & Fischer, B. (2006). Student perspectives on the qualities/behaviors of faculty that contribute most significantly to student learning. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 2, 67-73.

Keeley, J., Furr, R. M., & Buskist, W. (2010). Differentiating psychology students’ perceptions of teachers using the Teacher Behavior Checklist. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 16-20.

Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The Teacher Behaviors Checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 84-91.

Murdock, Jr., B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.

Santhanam, E., & Hicks, O. (2002). Disciplinary, gender and course year influences on student perceptions of teaching: Explorations and implications. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 17-31.

Zhivkova, H. (1992). Evaluation of the lecturer: The ideal and reality. Annals of Community-Oriented Education, 5, 215-222.